Understanding the Law
Explaining court cases, statutes, and executive actions across the country, providing valuable analysis of the facts and legal impact on the public.
Mark Cuban’s decade-long fight with the SEC is over following his being found not guilty of insider trading.
...[Continue Reading]
Does the new employer healthcare mandate pass the “strict scrutiny” test, or are Obama’s carve outs too arbitrary to pass muster?
...[Continue Reading]
California’s new anti-harassment law has good intentions in penalizing those who harass celebrities’ children, but may potentially target the wrong people.
...[Continue Reading]
Two Virginia college newspapers emerged victorious after six long years of litigating their First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
...[Continue Reading]
A U.K. court enjoins the Wall Street Journal from publishing names of those involved in the Libor Scandal, restricting the company’s freedom of speech on the internet.
...[Continue Reading]
The plaintiff’s second motion for the recusal of Justice Newby is expected to come to the same end as the first: denial.
...[Continue Reading]
A recent medical malpractice case received a necessary privilege audit from the North Carolina Court of Appeals.
...[Continue Reading]
An application of the recent Ortiz-Zape decision reveals the steps North Carolina lawyers need to take to protect their client and promote confidence in the justice system.
...[Continue Reading]
An application of the recent Ortiz-Zape decision reveals the steps North Carolina lawyers need to take to protect their client and promote confidence in the justice system.
...[Continue Reading]
Many businesses, including electronics companies Motorola, Lenovo, and Apple, have brought manufacturing jobs back to the United States despite the costs involved, showing that they value the benefits of the “Made in America” brand.
...[Continue Reading]
There is renewed pressure on the FCC to eliminate its nearly forty year-old “sports blackout rule.”
...[Continue Reading]
A string of lawsuits surrounding the internet radio leader calls into question the integrity and objectives of Pandora’s conventional radio station purchase.
...[Continue Reading]
Under the testing analyst and testifying analyst paradigm that is now the law in North Carolina, the jury gets to hear an expert opine that a substance is cocaine, but the criminal defendant never gets to confront the expert who actually conducted the tests that produced that opinion.
...[Continue Reading]
On the morning of June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States was set to announce its decision in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. Many Americans believed the opinion would be landmark, a definitive ruling on the long-debated issue of affirmative action in college admissions
...[Continue Reading]
«
1
…
7
8
9
10
11
12
»