Even in the face of the botched execution of Clayton Lockett and Attorney General Holder’s support of a moratorium on the death penalty, some states continue setting execution dates.
Tension in statutory language is evident between the Affordable Care Act and the Internal Revenue Service Regulations.
Attorney General Eric Holder recently stated that he believes all executions should be halted until the Supreme Court hears a pending Oklahoma case arising out of an inmate’s botched execution.
The Court will consider the role of states in creating specialty license plates in Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.
The Supreme Court of the United States is set to hear another case that seeks to protect mentally ill inmates from execution.
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide whether employers must provide special accommodations for pregnant employees.
Colorado is seeking certiorari to ask the Supreme Court whether a warrant is required when performing an involuntary blood test in DUI cases.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision not to hear appeals of same-sex marriage cases has resulted in a wave of states recognizing these unions.
A Muslim teenager who was denied a job because her hijab violated Abercrombie & Fitch’s “Look Policy” is fighting back.
North Carolina’s new voter identification law, made possible by the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder, may prevent thousands of voters from participating in upcoming elections.
The Supreme Court’s decision in McCullen v. Coakley affirms that content-neutral regulations can still violate the First Amendment.
The controversial Supreme Court decision turns on a hotly debated question: who is a “person” under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993?
The Court’s unanimous decision in the June 2014 Noel Canning case found President Obama’s January 2012 recess appointments unconstitutional.
In Harris v. Quinn the Supreme Court of the United States found that in-home caregivers cannot be required to join a union or pay its dues.
Aereo used cloud computing to change the way we watch TV, but the Supreme Court has held that its transmissions violated copyright law.
