Supreme Court OK’s new lethal injection drug
In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court holds that midazolam is a sufficient lethal injection substitute, and consequently does not violate the Eighth Amendment.
In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court holds that midazolam is a sufficient lethal injection substitute, and consequently does not violate the Eighth Amendment.
After a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in favor of gay marriage nationwide, where will the focus be for the LGBTQ movement?
Civil rights groups across Florida have filed a lawsuit seeking an emergency injunction in response to a new law that will impose a 24-hour waiting period on women seeking abortions after they receive “informed consent.”
U.S. Supreme Court will decide if representation should reflect the number of eligible voters or overall population
In another 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States chooses to withhold First Amendment analysis in this true threats case, but instead held that 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) requires a defendant intend to communicate a threat to be guilty of communicating threats via interstate commerce.
North Carolina legislature overrides Governor Pat McCrory’s veto of the anti-gay religious freedom bill
A three-decade-old murder conviction is challenged on a potential Batson violation
UPDATE: In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States holds that Title VII does not require an employer to have actual knowledge of a potential or current employee’s religious practice.
SCOTUS to weigh in on Mississippi’s targeted regulations meant to shut down abortion clinics.
No discrimination where breastfeeding mother feels forced out of her job
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Young v. UPS on March 25, 2015.
What does it mean for a health insurance exchange to be “established by the state?”
States such as Pennsylvania and Florida have recently elected to halt executions over concerns about the drugs used in lethal injections, but not without opposition from lawmakers.
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed a Fourth Circuit case allowing business owners to offer teeth whitening services without a dentistry license.
If the Supreme Court rules against the ACA’s subsidies in King v. Burwell, many Americans could lose their health insurance.