Judges find constitutional flaws in NC abortion law
The law compelling doctors to describe ultrasound images to patients unconstitutionally infringed upon their free speech rights.
The newest articles featured on our homepage.
The law compelling doctors to describe ultrasound images to patients unconstitutionally infringed upon their free speech rights.
After a slow start, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has become one of the biggest sources of fines collected by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Colleges struggle to strike a balance between respecting students’ rights and helping campus police departments do their job.
Women seeking abortions will no longer be required to undergo an ultrasounds, but other restrictions will remain in place.
A Washington State University Professor is attempting to develop the marijuana equivalent of a breathalyzer which may substantially aid law enforcement in DWI stops.
Islamic banking institutions need to get creative in order to get around Sharia law’s restrictions on traditional banking.
Social media has created new opportunities for libel, harassment, and even serious crimes.
Grand jurors’ tendency to trust law enforcement officials and the ability of government attorneys to present evidence in a positive light contributes to difficulties in indicting police officers.
The Supreme Court of the United States is set to hear another case that seeks to protect mentally ill inmates from execution.
Does Teresa Giudice have anyone but herself to blame for her recent legal woes?
Doxing is the practice of compiling someone’s information from the internet and releasing it to cause harm. In most cases, it is (almost) perfectly legal.
What are the potential benefits and consequences of North Carolina’s recently passed jury trial waiver amendment?
In a practice called “corporate inversion,” American companies fleeing high corporate tax rates seek to reincorporate overseas.
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide whether employers must provide special accommodations for pregnant employees.
Some magistrates argue they should not be required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples because doing so would interfere with their religious beliefs.